REVIEW: AUTOart Bugatti EB110 GT • Diecastsociety.com

REVIEW: AUTOart Bugatti EB110 GT

Words  courtesy of Wes Shakirov / StratosWRC

 

The EB110 is definitely a tricky car to put a finger on. Once described as ‘oddly attractive’, its styling certainly divides opinion. However, that is not to say that it’s not painfully desirable. Revived in the late 80s by a Ferrari distributor Romano Artioli, the Bugatti brand came back to life after half a century of dormancy. A state-of-the-art factory was erected to build the new car, with no expense spared in its development. Marcello Gandini himself was recruited to do the styling, while a French aeronautics company called Aerospatiale was employed to help build the carbon tub. Clearly, it seemed the project was destined for utter greatness. Except that it wasn’t. Gandini’s styling did not please Artioli, bearing too much resemblance to Lamborghini cars. When Gandini refused to redo the styling, the job was forwarded to several others, who added and took away elements, ending up with the mixed basket that is the EB110. Personally, I really love the front end, but the rear end is just so unimaginative. I can definitely see where the multiple input issue is a problem when it comes to styling. The car lacks visual cohesiveness, although it sort of adds to its charm. Artioli envisioned building up to 300 cars a year, but by the end, only 140 units were sold, 102 ‘regular’ GTs, and 38 Supersports. Two of the former were eventually upgraded to the SS specification. Dauer Racing also acquired some unbuilt cars and finished them to their own specification, which eventually became the Dauer EB110 in 2001. Financial turmoil around the time of the release (1992), coupled with questionable styling, turned the EB110 into a sales flop. Add the brilliant McLaren F1 into the mix, and it’s clear the Bug never stood a chance. Indeed, even now the F1s are selling for 10 times more than the EB110s. The factory doors closed and the brand was bought by the Volkswagen group, which went on to develop the Veyron.

bugatti_eb11014

bugatti_eb11017

So I’m very glad that AUTOart chose to make this misunderstood and, in my opinion, underrated supercar. I suppose it was only a matter of time, but I am very glad nonetheless to finally have it in front of me. AUTOart chose to make the standard EB110, not the SS (although I hope they’ll make that too!), and it is worth it to mention that of the 102 cars built, no two were exactly alike. This makes comparisons largely irrelevant, as it’s impossible to know which car they based the model on. So instead of nitpicking about authenticity, I will examine the model and judge it based on what it is.

bugatti_eb1102

bugatti_eb1103

Looking at it for the first time, you feel like you’re in for a treat. The paint and finish are up to the usual AUTOart standards, and all the badges are present and correct. My only criticism would be the rather giant door open button, which is understandable, as you wouldn’t be able to operate the door mechanism otherwise. The doors snap open and stay that way, similar to the Aventador. The ventilation flaps just behind the B-pillars are movable, which is a cool touch, and they have the EB110 logo printed on them, which simply stands for the 110th birthday of Ettore Bugatti on the day that the car was announced. The air channels adjacent to the headlights are sadly blind, as are the smaller side vents either side of the front bumper. However, there is glorious perforated mesh everywhere you look, and I counted at least 23 separate grilles. The front hood can be opened to reveal various electronics and the battery.

bugatti_eb1108

bugatti_eb1109

The interior was always the EB110’s weakest point. It looks a little plain in there, which is at odds with the quad-turbo V12 monster sitting just behind you. Hence, AUTOart is not to blame for how bland the interior looks. I like the fact that it is at least off-white in colour, as opposed to dull black, as is the case with a lot of their models (the Huayra comes to mind). Detail extends to the top of the cabin as well.

bugatti_eb1107

bugatti_eb11012

I quite like the engine. Apart from being ensconced in all kinds of mesh, it’s a good-looking unit with nice colour coding and tasteful carbon on the tubing. There are metal rods and photo-etch plates, and the hose clamps are actually made of some kind of foil or photo-etched material, rather than just being painted on. Hold the engine cover open and shine a light into the black crevice that is at the back of the engine, and you’ll see two photo-etched radiators that are completely out of view and almost invisible to the naked eye. Hats off to AUTOart for including detail that cannot be immediately seen. The wing can be extended and positioned quite easily. Flipping the car over, you get to see the rest of the engine block, exhaust, some more delicious mesh, brake cooling hoses and partially functional suspension (only front).

bugatti_eb11019

It is clear that AUTOart now stratifies their Signature range into several price points. The Aston One-77 was an example of the lower end of the Signature range, and while the EB110 rests comfortably above it, it is certainly no Huayra, but then again, the price reflects that. The fact that this is a 90s supercar, and they weren’t awfully detailed back then, exacerbates this impression, leading you to think that this model isn’t all that detailed. However, don’t be mistaken, this is a great model, with authentic detail in places where it matters, and I’m very very glad to have added one to my collection. Now, the release colour of the EB110 was blue, but both the Silver and Dark Red also look good. Personally, I don’t like the white, but it is available, if collecting white supercars is your thing, or if your name is Chris Evans. Whichever colour you choose, be sure to add this model. It belongs in every supercar collection. Believe it or not, but the EB110 raced at Le Mans and at a multitude of other motorsport venues, so I do hope AUTOart will consider bringing the racing versions to us aficionados as well. Come on, AUTOart, I know you want to!

bugatti_eb1104 bugatti_eb1105 bugatti_eb1106

bugatti_eb11010 bugatti_eb11011 bugatti_eb11013

bugatti_eb11015 bugatti_eb11016 bugatti_eb11018

bugatti_eb11020 bugatti_eb11021 bugatti_eb11022

Written by

9 Responses to "REVIEW: AUTOart Bugatti EB110 GT"

  1. DS Team says:

    This model on every level is far superior than the Bbrugo piece I’ve had for the last ten years or so, thought the AUTOart piece left me wanting more. I can’t really place my finger on it,,, Definitely doesn’t live up to “Signature” series. Hey you can’t win them all I guess!

  2. Wes Shakirov says:

    I don’t know, I disagree. I think it’s excellent in terms of representing the car for what it was. I don’t think there’s anything Autoart could have done to make it better without raising the price. The metal bits in the engine, the 23 (!) perforated grilles all over the car, are just some of the evidence that some real effort was put into it.

  3. KARsten says:

    I agree that in a supercar collection this car may be considered a “must”, and be it as merely a chapter in the Bugatti history leading up to the Veyron. And AUTOart is certainly not to blame in any way, BUT: I am like Davide; I had the Burago for very much the same reason (must-have in supercar collection),but have never liked the real car´s styling much anyway. (Even the Paragon i8 raises more enthusiasm with me.) Obviously, the engine seems to be the best part on the EB110 (and I´m not much of an engine guy). So, even though I might regret it later (and even then only in terms of completeness of collection), I remain reluctant to add the EB110 to my collection.

  4. Bluespace says:

    The AA EB110 was one of my most anticipated model (apart from the F1 LM) in recent years. I’ve always loved Gandini cars and the EB110 had a certain feel that made it special.

    It was an exciting event opening the package because I knew Autoart would do this car with quality it deserved, and I could finally put away one of the very few remaining Maisto models in my shelf.

    While the overall quality and some of the ‘special’ details were a lot of fun to see, I did have two major issues with AA’s model. First, the ‘Bugatti Blue’ color seemed quite off. I’ve seen many EB110’s over the years, especially in this paint and it just felt too flat and a few shades off. The second issue is the door supports where the supports rattles around like something is loose inside. I thought my model was broken with bits rattling around inside, but discovered all the models do that.

    I was also quite surprised with AA color choices. The white and red seems like an odd choice that doesn’t show off the car very well. I would’ve liked to see a black or even the yellow… hopefully they’ll do the SS (like the Schumacher SS) in those colors!

    I am nitpicking, of course… I love this model, happy that AA had the guts to do it. Overall, a very good model that’s worth the price.

    • DS Team says:

      This a good piece, not a GREAT piece from AUTOart. Like you it left me a little down based on Signature badge and price!

      • Wes Shakirov says:

        You guys are crazy! The model is excellent, Autoart even included the luggage behind the passenger seat.

        • Romario says:

          The Model is nice, but… The blue color, it is terrible (the choice)! May this color was also on real car, but the blue “soap” color as it was on Bburago ist the right think for Bugatti!

  5. Edib says:

    I saw this exact same color EB110 on a guys trailer in Italy in 1996/97, it was amazing to see it as an 8yr old, but the style is really an acquired taste. not as elegant as ferrari and lamborghini of the period.

Leave a reply